ABSTRACT
Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited blood disorder characterized by vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs). Crizanlizumab infusion was FDA approved in 2019 to reduce VOCs in patients with SCD ≥16 years old. There is little real-world evidence (RWE) regarding crizanlizumab use. Objective: To describe real-world crizanlizumab utilization. Methods: Using IQVIA’s US-based Longitudinal Pharmacy and Medical Claims Databases, patients with an SCD diagnosis between 01-November-2018 and 30-April-2021, ≥1 crizanlizumab claim (index date=first crizanlizumab claim) between 01-November-2019 and 31-January-2021, aged ≥16-years at index, ≥12-months of pre-index, and ≥6-months of post-index data were identified. Crizanlizumab treatment patterns were characterized by doses received, gap-days between doses (days between end of days-supply of one dose to the next administration), discontinuation (≥60-day gap), days on therapy prior to discontinuation, and restarts. Results: In total 262 patients were included. Of these patients, 235(87%) received dose #2, 204(78%) received dose #3, and 174(66%) received ≥4 doses with a median(interquartile range [IQR]) of 125(43-180) days on therapy prior to discontinuation. In the 6-months post-index, 150(57%) patients discontinued crizanlizumab. Of those patients who discontinued crizanlizumab, 46(31%) restarted. Among the 112 patients that did not discontinue, the median(IQR) gap-days between doses 1&2=2(1-15) days, between doses 2&3=1(1-7) days, between doses 3&4=1(1-5) days, and between doses 4&5=1(1-6) days. At the end of the 6-months of follow-up, 88 patients (34% of all patients) appeared to be on crizanlizumab. Conclusions: This RWE suggests that 66% of patients who receive crizanlizumab receive ≥4 doses within 6-months, patients receiving multiple doses appear to have a reduction in gap-days with each subsequent dose, and that of those who discontinue treatment, 31% restart crizanlizumab within 6-months post-index. Due to the nature of claims data, the reasons for discontinuation or gaps between doses are unknown. The impact of COVID-19 restrictions or other access barriers on crizanlizumab use is also unknown.
ABSTRACT
Background: Therapeutic options for Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) have increased recently as well as the development of updated national guidelines. It is not known how these options are being offered or to what degree guidelines are incorporated into clinical practice. Objectives: To assess the clinical practice patterns of providers treating children with SCD. Design/Method: A survey study was performed which included nine sections: clinic structure, prophylaxis, immunizations, hydroxyurea, splenic sequestration, stroke, novel therapies, potential curative therapies, and transition. Survey was disseminated over a three-month period via SurveyMonkey, to members of the American Society of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Hemoglobinopathy Special Interest Group. Results: There were 86 respondents;most were attending/faculty (85%, 73/86) who were part of a university/academic practice (65%, 56/86). Program size was most commonly 50-250 patients (44%, 37/86). Accessibility to support staff in clinic included 95% (81/86) social work;76% (65/86) child life;68% (58/86) nurse coordinator and 34% (29/86) school liaison and 15% (13/86) transition navigator. For preventive care, 72% prescribe penicillin prophylaxis before 2 months of age recommending 100% (83) for HbSS and Sβnull, 72% (60/83) for HbSC and 70% (58/83) for HbSβplus. Influenza was the most common vaccine offered in clinic at 96% (76/79) with 91% (72/79) offering pneumococcal vaccines, 84% (67/79) offering meningococcal vaccines and 50% (40/79) offering COVID vaccines. Transcranial doppler screening was offered in 95% (69/73) but only 42% (31/73) performed MRI screening for silent stroke. Transfusion therapy was recommended for primary stroke prevention by 90% (65/72) and 84% (59/70) attempt to transition to hydroxyurea following TWITCH guidelines. For secondary stroke prevention, 88% (63/72) recommend chronic transfusion therapy. Regarding disease-modifying therapy, 90% (70/78) report starting hydroxyurea routinely in patients with HbSS and Sβnull;initiated at 9 months of age by 69% (54/78). Laboratory monitoring recommended every 3 months for stable dosing by 62% (49/78) and hydroxyurea held by 56% (44/78) if platelets <75,000, 73% (56/78) for neutrophils <1000. New therapies were recommended for patients on hydroxyurea who were still experiencing SCD complications: L-glutamine 68% (37/54;crizanlizumab 93% (54/58). Voxelotor was recommended for patients on hydroxyurea with low hemoglobin 65% (43/66). Matched sibling transplant was considered for any disease severity by 55% (38/69). Gene therapy trial is offered on-site by 29% (20/69). Transition programs were endorsed by 61% (42/69), but only 45% (31/68) had dedicated staff. Conclusion: This survey is the only assessment of the application of SCD guidelines in clinical practice.
ABSTRACT
Background: Persons with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) infected with the SARS CoV-2 virus have significantly increased risks of hospitalization and death and are strongly recommended to be fully vaccinated. Vaccine hesitancy has previously been described in the SCD population and uptake of other recommended vaccines has been reported to be low in some studies. The goal of this study was to assess how vaccination rates amongst eligible pediatric and adult SCD patients in British Columbia (BC), Canada, compared to those of the general population and other “clinically extremely vulnerable” (CEV) groups. Methods: Persons age 12 and over with SCD in BC were identified as a CEV population and prioritized for immunization. A comprehensive process was undertaken to find and identify all CEV patients in BC and notify them of their priority status. Individuals diagnosed with SCD in the province were identified in the shared pediatric and adult patient registry (iCHIP), which tracks demographics, diagnoses and therapies, and added to the CEV patient list. SCD patients were notified of their priority status through standard mail from the provincial health officer, as well as emails and phone calls from the pediatric and adult SCD programs. Those aged 16+ were invited to register for immunization beginning in March 2021 while those 12-15 years were permitted to register starting in May 2021. Adult patients were eligible to receive mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna as well as the Astra-Zeneca (AZ) COVISHIELD vaccine, while those aged 12-17 were eligible only for Pfizer vaccines. The provincial immunization registry (PIR) was interrogated to confirm vaccine administration. The main outcome measure was the proportion of SCD patients who received 1st and 2nd dose COVID vaccines. Results: 138 individuals age 12+ with SCD were identified in the iCHIP database. 71.0% had Sickle Cell Anemia (SCA), 25.4% had Hemoglobin SC (Hb SC) and 3.6% had other genotypes. Participants ranged in age from 12-69 years with a median of 28 years. 67.4% were receiving disease-modifying therapy (76 were on hydroxyurea, 11 on regular red cell exchange, 1 was receiving crizanlizumab, and 5 with Hb SC were phlebotomized). None were treated with gene therapy or transplant. 7 individuals had a PCR-confirmed SARS CoV-2 infection prior, but none following immunization. As of July 30, 2021: 68.8% of persons with SCD received a 1st and 55.1% received a 2nd dose of COVID vaccine. Almost all doses were mRNA-based vaccines with the exception of a single 1st dose administration of AZ. Vaccination rates amongst different age ranges and genotypes are displayed in Table 1. Patients with SCA did not have significantly different vaccination rates compared to those with Hb SC/other genotypes: 64.3% versus 80.0% for 1st dose (p=0.0703) and 48.0% versus 62.5% (p =0.12114) for 2nd dose. Vaccination rates amongst the SCD group were compared to other age matched CEV populations as well as the general provincial population and are detailed in Tables 2 and 3. A higher proportion of persons with SCD under the age of 20 received 1st dose (70.8% versus 31.1%;p<0.00001) and 2nd dose (50.0 versus 15.3%;p <0.00001) of vaccines compared to the general population. However, a lower proportion age 20-49 and 50+ years old received a 1st dose as demonstrated in Table 2. In addition, lower proportions of persons with SCD of all age ranges were vaccinated in comparison to other CEV groups. As demonstrated in Table 3, SCD was not associated with receiving a 1st dose vaccine compared to the general BC population (OR 0.8, 0.56 to 1.16 95% CI, p=0.2481). In contrast, persons in other CEV groups were twice as likely to receive a first dose COVID immunization compared to the general BC population (p<0.0001). No severe vaccine-related complications including vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) were reported. There were 7 presentations to hospital for vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) within 21 days of immunization. Conclusion: Despite an active CEV process to find and invite perso s with SCD to be vaccinated, these data demonstrate that vaccination rates amongst persons with SCD in BC are below those of other CEV age-matched groups. Vaccination rates amongst adults are also lower than the general population, however there is a high vaccination rate in persons under 20 years old. A subsequent qualitative study exploring COVID vaccine hesitancy amongst persons with SCD in BC is being explored. [Formula presented] Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
ABSTRACT
Background Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a hemoglobinopathy which manifests clinically as hemolytic anemia and recurrent episodes of pain caused by vaso-occlusion, among other symptoms. Vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) account for an overwhelming majority of visits to the emergency room (ER) and hospitalizations for patients with SCD (Shah et al. PLoS One 2019). Upregulation of P-selectin, a cellular adhesion protein expressed on activated platelets and endothelial cells, contributes to the pathophysiology of VOCs. Crizanlizumab is a monoclonal antibody administered intravenously that inhibits the interaction of P-selectin with its ligand;it was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a treatment for SCD patients in 2019. In the Phase II SUSTAIN trial, crizanlizumab therapy resulted in a significantly lower rate of sickle cell-related pain crises than placebo (Ataga et al. N Engl J Med 2017). Due to their high-risk status for COVID-19, the pandemic has posed significant challenges for SCD patients to readily access healthcare, including novel therapies such as crizanlizumab. This study aimed to investigate the utility of telemedicine in facilitating access to crizanlizumab as well as compare acute medical care utilization for patients on crizanlizumab six months before initiating therapy and up to six months after their final dose in 2020. Methods All patients (≥18 years of age as of January 1, 2020) with SCD who received crizanlizumab between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020 at Rush University Medical Center (RUMC) were included in the final analysis. Demographic features as well as the type of visit when the patient and healthcare provider discussed crizanlizumab treatment was documented. Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank tests were utilized to compare acute medical care utilization - defined by the number of ER visits, urgent care visits, and hospitalizations - six months prior to initiating therapy and six months after completing the specified therapy regimen for 2020. Simple linear regression models and multiple regression models were conducted to control for sex, BMI, age, insurance, duration of treatment, and type of visit. Results A total of ten patients were included in the final analysis. Five (50%) patients first agreed to proceed with crizanlizumab therapy during a telehealth video visit with their provider, one (10%) made the decision during a telehealth phone visit, and the other four (40%) did so during a traditional office visit. 9 (90%) patients were still on crizanlizumab after June 1, 2020, the date that RUMC urgent care started seeing patients with SCD. The mean number of visits to the ER in the period before initiating therapy was 2.8 (SD=4.26) compared to 2.5 (SD=2.76) after last dose in 2020, however this finding did not achieve statistical significance (p>0.9999). Visits to the urgent care clinic, on average, increased significantly from 1.7 (SD=2.87) in the six months before initiating therapy to 8.2 (SD=11.02) in the six months after ending therapy for 2020 (p=0.0234). The mean number of hospitalizations in the period before initiating therapy was 6.6 (SD=5.19) compared to 4.6 (SD=3.44) in the period after last dose in 2020, however this was also not statistically significant (p=0.2309). None of the covariates had a significant effect on differences in acute care utilization in the period before and after therapy in 2020. Conclusion This study suggests that administration of crizanlizumab therapy did reduce hospitalization and ED visits, but the results could not achieve statistical significance due to our small sample size and short study duration. The number of urgent care visits for these patients, however, did differ significantly from the period before initiating therapy to the six months after the last dose in 2020. This finding can be attributed to the fact that due to the COVID-19 pandemic, urgent care services were made increasingly available to SCD patients beginning on June 1, 2020 to avoid admissions to the ER and hospital. Additionally, our study suggests that during the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine played an important role in providing health services to patients with SCD, and it could continue to improve care accessibility for SCD patients after the pandemic. Continued collection and analysis of real-world data is needed to further understand the effect of crizanlizumab therapy on utilization of acute medical care. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Jain: DOVA: Other: advisory board;Sanofi: Other: advisory board;Argenx: Other: advisory board;Novartis: Speakers Bureau;GBT: Speakers Bureau.
ABSTRACT
Background: Vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) are the most common acute complication of sickle cell disease (SCD). Crizanlizumab, an anti-P-selectin monoclonal antibody, is an FDA-approved disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for SCD patients (pts) aged ≥16 yrs to reduce the frequency of VOC. To better understand its use and impact, the National Alliance for Sickle Cell Centers (NASCC) conducted a retrospective study of pts prescribed crizanlizumab from 11/2019-6/30/2021. NASCC is a non-profit organization formed to support SCD centers in delivering quality comprehensive care by setting and adopting specific standards and advocating for improved health outcomes in SCD. This study describes the largest real-world cohort of pts treated with crizanlizumab. Methods: This is a two-part study. Part 1 was to evaluate NASCC center crizanlizumab practice and to summarize data on insurance approval and the frequency of drug discontinuation. Part 2 includes pt level data to evaluate reasons for discontinuation and acute care utilization pre and post therapy. Acute care use includes day hospital/infusion, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations for VOC (excluding COVID-19). The index date for each pt is defined as the 1st crizanlizumab infusion date. Chart review (electronic health records) was used to identify all acute care visits 12 months pre-index and ≤12 months post index. Acute care data will be analyzed in aggregate. Evaluation of center-specific use of crizanlizumab, time to initial site level formulary approval and drug discontinuation were analyzed. Pt level data collection is ongoing to include sufficient time post index date. VOC characteristics will be summarized using medians, median differences (pre/post treatment), and 95% confidence intervals. Additional evaluation of effectiveness of crizanlizumab will include analysis based on number of doses received, pre-treatment VOC burden, concomitant hydroxyurea (HU) use and genotype. Results: Data includes pts prescribed crizanlizumab at 11 NASCC centers. Site- formulary approvals to use crizanlizumab varied from 12/2019-12/2020. As a result, the 1st pt to receive treatment at each site varied from 1/15/2020-1/20/2021. Mean time from site-level approval to first infusion was 77 days (range: 0-394). Over 50% of sites received insurance denials mainly due to “insufficient medical necessity” or “medication not covered by the prescription plan.” Sites were able to successfully appeal denials for 71% of pts (Table 1). Treatment Delivery: Each site gives infusions over 30 minutes and the majority (64%) do not use pre-medication unless pts had reactions. Some sites use diphenhydramine/acetaminophen (3) or normal saline and ketorolac (1). All sites prescribe crizanlizumab to pts of all SCD genotypes. Pts Treated: 297 pts were prescribed crizanlizumab of whom 238 received ≥ 1 infusion. There was variation in number of pts/site (range 6-73, mean 21) due to time to site-level approval, insurance and pt population. Of these 238, 75 pts (32%) discontinued treatment (0-17 pts/site). Sites reported pts perceived lack of improvement or feeling their overall pain was increased, transportation issues and infusion related reactions (IRRs) characterized by pain as some of the reasons for discontinuation. Evaluation of real-world efficacy measured by changes in acute care utilization, including sub-analysis by genotype, pre-treatment VOC burden and concomitant HU use, are pending sample size dependent feasibility. Discussion: This is the first multi-center real-world analysis of crizanlizumab. Findings demonstrate some insurance barriers to therapy. The majority of pts who initiated crizanlizumab have remained on therapy;however, 1/3 of pts had lack of effect or barriers to care. Pt level data will include characteristics related to treatment failure or IRR. Improving the understanding of phenotype-specific response to novel therapies is essential in SCD. Conclusion: Post-approval therapies for rare diseases must undergo real-world evaluation to ensure study results transla e to the community. NASCC uses defined criteria for multidisciplinary care for Alliance inclusion and findings reflect the use of DMT in such centers. This is the first NASCC study of DMT in SCD. Part 2 of the study will give early insights into the effectiveness of crizanlizumab;long term follow-up is needed for a full understanding of its utility in SCD. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Kanter: Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy;Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Forma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Agios: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Beam: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Graphite Bio: Consultancy;GuidePoint Global: Honoraria;Fulcrum Tx: Consultancy. Manwani: Novartis: Consultancy. Idowu: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Pfizer: Research Funding;Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Forma Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding;Ironwood: Research Funding. Treadwell: National Alliance of Sickle Cell Centers: Other: Early Evaluation of the Use of Crizanlizumab in Sickle Cell Disease. Clay: GBT: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Honoraria. Little: Hemex Health, Inc.: Patents & Royalties;Biochip Labs: Patents & Royalties. Desai: Global Blood Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding;Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Pfizer: Other: Publication Fee, Research Funding;Forma: Consultancy;Foundation for Sickle Cell Research: Honoraria. Lanzkron: Shire: Research Funding;Pfizer: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company;Bluebird Bio: Consultancy;Teva: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company;Novo Nordisk: Consultancy;GBT: Research Funding;Imara: Research Funding;CSL Behring: Research Funding;Novartis: Research Funding.
ABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: The COVID-19 (CO19) pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 remains a significant issue for global health, economics, and society. Several reports have shown that African Americans (AA) have been disproportionately affected by the CO19 pandemic. Limited data have suggested that sickle cell disease (SCD) could be one of the several reasons for higher morbidity and mortality related to CO19 among AA. Recent reports have suggested higher-than-average morbidity and mortality related to CO19 among patients with SCD. We conducted a retrospective, single-institution study in adult patients with SCD who were diagnosed with CO19 infection and their outcomes. Methods: After IRB approval, we conducted a chart review of adult patients (greater than 18 years) with SCD who were diagnosed with CO19 infection between March 1st, 2020, and March 31st, 2021. We recorded demographic data including age, gender, social factors (the type of insurance, availability of primary care provider (PCP), living alone/not), clinical parameters (type of SCD, co-morbidities), outpatient management of SCD, and how CO19 infection was managed like inpatient admission and complications. In patients who were admitted or seen in the emergency department (ED), we collected additional data including vitals, labs, the severity of illness, complications, length of stay, and outcomes. Computations were performed using statistical software SAS 9.4 for Windows. Results: We found a total of 51 patients with SCD diagnosed with CO19 infection in the above period. The median age of patients was 30 years. 61% were females and 39 % were males. All of them were AA. 11.76% were living alone, 49.02% were living with family, 1.96% (1 patient) was institutionalized, and the living situation was unknown in 37.25%. Most of the patients had Medicaid Insurance (52.94%), Medicare in 33.3%, private insurance in 13.73 % and 2% were uninsured. Only 64.71% of patients had a PCP. 60% had HbSS disease, 32% had HbSC disease, 4% had HbS-beta thalassemia, one patient each had HbSS with hereditary persistence of HbF and HbS/HbD. Comorbidities and previous history included acute chest syndrome in 65.96%, avascular necrosis in 36.96%, leg ulcers in 8.7%, hypertension in 8.7%, sickle cell retinopathy in 14.57%, cerebrovascular disease in 26.19%, chronic kidney disease in 7.69%, venous thromboembolism (VTE) in 20.41%, 10.41% were on anticoagulation, history of HIV and hepatitis C infection in 6.38%. 28.21% of patients were maintained on partial exchange transfusions as an outpatient for various indications. 72.73% were on hydroxyurea, 7.5% were on crizanlizumab, 5.26% were on voxelotor and 26.83% were on iron chelation. Vitals and pertinent lab values on initial assessment were recorded and many patients had missing data. On presentation, 25.53% were febrile, 29.17% of patients were tachycardic, 31.25% were hypoxic (SpO2 < 95%), 38.46% were tachypneic, 59.18% had a body mass index (BMI) of > 24.9. Median hemoglobin and hematocrit were 8.9/27.4 g/dL. The median white blood cell count was 9490/uL and platelets were 315,000/uL. Median ferritin was 1573 ug/L. Median bilirubin and creatinine were 2.05 mg/dL and 0.86 mg/dL. The patients were further stratified based on the clinical location where CO19 infection was managed (Table 1). 39.3% were diagnosed in the outpatient setting/ED and 60.3% in the inpatient setting. Among 51 patients, 5.71% (n=2) required ICU admission and was mechanically ventilated. 17.5% received dexamethasone, 7.69% received remdesivir, 2.76% received convalescent plasma, 17.07% had infections and 47% received antibiotics. Only one patient received an exchange transfusion during admission. One patient developed a new VTE after CO19 infection. On statistical analysis, the only factor which impacted the clinical location of management was tachycardia (P=0.007). Of the 51 patients, only 3.9% (2 patients) died of complications of CO19 infection, one with hypoxic respiratory failure, disseminated intravascular coagulation, shock, and the other one with pulmonary mbolism. 13% were readmitted within a month, one of them was admitted with a new pulmonary embolism and the others were admitted for acute painful episodes. Conclusion: We found a mortality rate of 3.9% in our single-center study of patients with SCD and CO19 infection. This mortality rate is lower than other published experiences in patients with SCD and CO19 infection. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Master: Blue Bird Bio: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company.
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 is characterized by vascular inflammation and thrombosis, including elevations in P-selectin, a mediator of inflammation released by endothelial cells. We tested the effect of P-selectin inhibition on biomarkers of thrombosis and inflammation in patients with COVID-19. Hospitalized patients with moderate COVID-19 were randomly assigned to receive either placebo or crizanlizumab, a P-selectin inhibitor, in a double-blind fashion. Crizanlizumab reduced P-selectin levels by 89%. Crizanlizumab increased D-dimer levels by 77% and decreased prothrombin fragment. There were no significant differences between crizanlizumab and placebo for clinical endpoints. Crizanlizumab was well tolerated. Crizanlizumab may induce thrombolysis in the setting of COVID-19. (Crizanlizumab for Treating COVID-19 Vasculopathy [CRITICAL]; NCT04435184).
ABSTRACT
The management of sickle cell disease (SCD) and its complications in the COVID-19 era is very challenging. The recurrent sickling process in SCD causes tissue hypoxemia and micro-infarcts, resulting in end organ damage. Since the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, little data has been published about SCD concerning clinical presentation with COVID-19 and management. Hydroxyurea has been the cornerstone of management in children and adults with SCD, with evidence of its effect on controlling end organ damage. There are several anti-sickling drugs that have been approved recently that might have an additive value toward the management of SCD and its complications. The role of simple and exchange transfusions is well established and should always be considered in the management of various complications. The value of convalescent plasma has been demonstrated in small case series, but large randomized controlled studies are still awaited. Immunomodulatory agents may play a role in reducing the damaging effects of cytokines storm that contributes to the morbidity and mortality in advanced cases. Prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered in every management protocol because SCD and COVID-19 are thrombogenic conditions. Management proposals of different presentations of patients with SCD and COVID-19 are outlined.